Messages

What part of Windows Gaming do you not like?  Actually... as I was thinking about this, I made a post lol:
https://www.chickendinnergaming.com/forum/pc-rigs-builds-and-peripheral-devices/windows-versus-linux-gaming/

Well, there's quite a few things, it's not all about gaming but Windows in general.

DirectX12 is just not a great API. On paper, it sounds good to give the developers more control in order to squeeze out more performance from a game, but the reality is that when developers are forced to make compromises due to budget and/or timing, performance and optimzation are the first to go. It's caused PC games to regress a bit in that area. It's to the point where some games even gain performance on Linux because Vulkan handles things better.

On top of that, Windows is just bloated with unnecessary pre-installed apps that don't need to be there. Why do I want a LinkedIn app already installed? Also, AMD CPUs are being short-changed in performance. These are the best gaming CPUs and Windows does not schedule them well (I'm not sure if this has been fixed though. Don't think I've heard that it has.) Linux however gives you the full performance out of the box.

Then there's Copilot. I DO NOT WANT COPILOT on my machine. I understand why it's pre-installed but I don't need it at all and I hate that's it's being forced down our throats for every little Microsoft app.

Microsoft is also forcing people to have a Microsoft account just to use the OS. The only reason I have one is because my Xbox account automatically became one. So I use that, but they're starting to close down all methods and loopholes that allow you to just have a local account.

There's also their recall software that's supposed to take a snapshot of everything you do on your computer. No thank you. I know that right now it's only certain PCs that have it and it's opt-in but I fully expect MS to go back on this and force it on people. It's just asking to be hacked and it will be.

Microsoft also just announced that the Teams software will become monitoring software. Yeah, that's another hard no from me.

And there's still more but it's not for this forum.

'Sup?

I do get these alerts at the top, but only if I manually opt-in for alerts for the boards I'm interested in or if I get pinged in a thread.

Which is okay, but if there's a new topic in a board I'm not subscribed to then I don't get alerted. That's the only difference between the last upgrade and now. I used to not have to subscribe to boards to get alerts. But it's fine enough. I've made it work.

Rick Henderson is the name of the game?  That's actually kind of interesting. I've never heard of it, and if I have, wouldn't have thought it was a game.

I'm not really a big fan of how Nintendo ports stuff though, they just slap it on a cart and throw it out there for full price.

To be a little fair to Nintendo this time, they did actually make improvements for the current 4K era.

Sorry, got caught up with some late meetings at work so wouldn't have been able to make it.

Wait nobody was looking where?  I have no idea I was supposed to be looking somewhere.

Actually, this is a good question. Was it supposed to be Discord? @BLUEVOODU

Sure thing... and great points.  It will block out the light, be of the same ergonomic form... etc.  However, looking at the images, unless there's something going on with their marketing, the lenses seem to be different.  If not, then... I might disappointed.  BV's hopes crushed lol 

Taking a look again, they do have different lenses in those pictures. Doesn't make any sense to me though. The games have to be displayed a certain way so having both behave slightly different just seems wrong.

Honestly, they should just get rid of the cardboard model and lower the price of the full visor. Seems like the cardboard model is just there to entice people to spend more money. Fake sense of choice.

Happy Birthday!!

@CreepinDeth --> I think that's a big leap.  Massive leap.  My guess is that the cardboard replicates an effect.  It's going to be highly simulated and workable... whereas the full accessory is going to work and view like the original Virtual Boy.  I think the experience is going to be way better with the full unit... and it better be for $100

As far as I'm aware, they both do the same thing. Neither product contains any electronics and both depend on the lenses that are attached to simulate the 3D effect. Both require the Switch screen to produce the image. It would be weird to manufacture two different types of lenses. Although I will agree that the full plastic kit will be a better experience because of the visor to block out light.

Hello, welcome!

$100 and you don't even get the controller? How can Nintendo make bluetooth replicas of previous gen consoles but not for the Virtual Boy?

It's super neat, and I do agree it's cool, but I'm going to have to pass unless I can get one for a cheaper price. I'm also not paying $20 for cardboard.

Come on @CreepinDeth, you need to buy the $20 cardboard LOL.    For me in my current household state, I'm 100% ok not having another controller.  Just adapt the Wii controller or pro controller to this process and done.  I'd be happy with that.

Sure, that's fine and reasonable. However, my main point is that for $100, I'm expecting the controller as well. Otherwise, I think it's too expensive for what it is. Especially if a piece of cardboard can create the same effect.

The good news for you all, I'm one less person you don't have to fight for online. 

I'm passing. Seems like people were correct in predicting that Galaxy 2 would be sold later when Nintendo didn't include it in the 3D All-Stars package.

And I believe that 3D All-Stars will have the inferior version of Galaxy 1. Nintendo won't upgrade it to the new version.

If I do change my mind to get it, I'll probably get a used copy for cheaper.

$100 and you don't even get the controller? How can Nintendo make bluetooth replicas of previous gen consoles but not for the Virtual Boy?

It's super neat, and I do agree it's cool, but I'm going to have to pass unless I can get one for a cheaper price. I'm also not paying $20 for cardboard.

Personally, if I were to get an alternative, I would still want it to run SteamOS and not Windows. I'm glad there are more of them coming to market and Valve working to make it compatible with other handhelds.

It's all a compromise though. Those alternatives might have better specs, but battery might be worse, or they run Windows, or they're so big they probably shouldn't be described as a handheld. It's nice that there's more choice though.

I'm going to wait. Thought about it a bit but at this point the Steam Deck is starting to struggle a little bit with newer titles (especially Unreal Engine 5 games.) I'll wait for Steam Deck 2.

However, if you don't own one, I would recommend it if you don't play the latest and greatest titles.

If we're going to have individual console forums, like in the Nintendo example, then we probably don't need a "Retro" forum. Having a Retro forum seems like it would also add work because if a console becomes retro then the site has to be adjusted to reflect that. Seems a little unnecessary.

Any one-off consoles can go in a miscellaneous section.

I also feel that Nintendo has lost their way, not the same company that they used to be.

Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I feel they've always been this way. The reason it's finally being shown who they are is because they have huge success with Switch and now Switch 2.

Over the decades Nintendo has been humbled just as often as they have been successful.

• The Virtual Boy
• the PlayStation debuting and outselling them after they decided to go with Philips for a CD attachment (Nintendo thought Sony was getting too much money from each CD sold)
• the GameCube sales (even though it's a great system)
• the Wii U

These are many different times where Nintendo had to take a step back and rethink their strategy (there are also more controversies that I can't remember.) Now that the Switch and Switch 2 are back-to-back successes, they are showing their over-protectiveness that they've always had. They just couldn't enforce it like they wanted to because a flop would disrupt them and take up their attention. When Nintendo is at the top, this is who I believe they are.

I watched this a couple of weeks ago. I give it a 7/10.

Overall it was a decent Superman movie. I do like David Corenswet as Superman and I think he fits the role better than Henry Canvill. I also liked Rachel Brosnahan's Lois Lane. I thought the chemistry was believable. I also liked the fact that other characters were already known in this universe. Lex Luthor was fine. I think Michael Rosenbaum from Smallville still has the best take of Lex this century.


However, there were definitely things I didn't like. Not a big fan of a lot of the dialogue. It felt like a Marvel movie in terms of the jokes. It was just too much sometimes. I'm starting to wonder if Gunn is the main reason for how Marvel films are written. The more I think about it, the more I realize there is definitely a tone shift from movies before Guardians of the Galaxy to everything else after. Even though Joss Whedon had a similar writing style in the first Avengers, Gunn might've established it more with his films. Some of it was even predictable, like when

Spoiler: ShowHide

Lois and Mr. Terrific stood in front of the garage door. Immediately knew that it was going to open slow. It was so obvious.

Krypto was cool but I do think they inserted him into too many scenes. Some worked and some definitely didn't. For example,

Spoiler: ShowHide

was not a fan of how he got involved in the final scene with Lex Luthor. Felt way too campy.

There's probably other stuff I can nitpick but I think I'll leave it there for now.

I've only done GamePass and that's only because I haven't had to pay for it for the last 4 years. I've been doing the Microsoft Rewards thing where I can redeem the points for monthly subscriptions. However, I think I'm done with it. My GamePass is through the end of January and I think that's enough for me. Don't feel like going through their Rewards system anymore.

In general though, game subscriptions are only as good as the price and for me they're all too expensive.

I forgot that Rocky Linux is enterprise level. For some reason I thought it was like Fedora. I'll look into it. I'm really used to debian/ubuntu distros, so my familiarity might make me lean towards ubuntu server, but I'll check out Rocky Linux. It's not happening anytime soon so I have time to research and install it on a spare PC to check it out.

Installing stuff... especially Mac and Linux, I'm using the command line and other utilities a lot.  I'm just used to it from an enterprise perspective.  I got away from that a bit with the MacBook Pro... but with Linux, it's just too easy and convenient.  The same goes for Windows... once you powershell and cli... you continue to do a lot that way (not necessarily install software though).

I think once I get my own personal Home Lab/Home Server going, I'll be using the CLI mostly. I think I'm going to use Ubuntu Server for it. Going to have to read up on it and get some practice in.

I don't really use the CLI unless I absolutely have to. I have no qualms with CLI. I just prefer installing stuff from the app store (preferably FlatPacks.) I think if Linux is going to be a true alternative to Windows, then it needs to be able to handle apps and general functionality with the desktop environment. That's just my personal opinion.

As for GNOME, I don't like that the app launcher has this icon on the top left of the screen to bring up the apps. It's clear that they want you to use the Super Key on your keyboard. I also don't like that it's not a traditional desktop. Feels more like a plain Window Manager instead. It's too simple of a desktop for me I guess. It also seems like they're trying to have a MacOS aesthetic. Which is cool I guess but since the functionality differs quite a bit, feels off.

I also already like KDE. It's the default DE for Steam Deck and I liked it out of the box. KDE seems to be making their own distro which I'm kind of interested in. I'll give Fedora with KDE a proper try and I'll let you know what I think.

Necrobump! 

I've started to slowly move away from Windows at this point. I have converted another machine to Zorin OS. This machine was only for ripping CDs and playing Spotify/Youtube music, so there's really no reason why I would keep Windows on it. Especially since it's losing support in October. This PC is perfectly fine and shouldn't be e-wasted just because it can't run the latest Windows OS.

I do still have machines with Windows. I'm keeping a laptop around with it in case I absolutely need it, plus my work PC and Gaming PC . Which I will most likely move away from there as well. Planning on picking up an AMD 9060XT/16GB and then running Bazzite on it for gaming. If there are any older titles that don't work with Linux then I might just keep an old machine running Windows for those. Not sure yet.

First on the list is to install Fedora and then give it a proper test drive to see if I like it.

I tried Fedora 41 and although seemed solid, was not a fan of pure, vanilla GNOME desktop. It seemed to get in my way more than it helped. I guess I'm just used to classic desktops with an app launcher on the bottom left. Might try the KDE version next.

I'm not really in the apple ecosystem, so a lot of those features don't really do much for me. I'm also thinking about getting one of the latest Mac Minis instead of a Macbook Pro. The only thing I don't like is that you aren't really supposed to upgrade the internal components so you have to jump through some hoops to update some of them.

@BLUEVOODU Do you prefer doing your work on a MB Pro vs. the other machines you've used?

Well, those games were not entirely bullet-proof either. Yes, the amount of games that required an update was very small but the process for that was to no longer produce the original ROM once they ran out and then start selling the version that has the fix in it. If you had a game with a blocker that prevented you from continuing the game, you had to call customer service in order to send your cart for the one with a fix. Silent revisions were a thing and some people scour for certain carts because of that.

There's also the fact that the older the hardware, the less likely it works. Capacitors explode, pins corrode or have difficulty making contact, ports die due to wear & tear, internal batteries leak.

I don't mean to be a doomer, but nothing lasts forever and I hope we're able to preserve all of this art in some way.

The thing is, these games shouldn't need an update, should it?

Well, that's up to the developer. Even if a game seems perfectly fine, there still could be an update the developers want you to have. Sometimes the updates don't specifically alter gameplay. Could be any number of reasons why the update was created and pushed out. That's not specific to Nintendo platforms either. We're going to start seeing more of this now that the XBox 360, PS3 and Wii are entering "Retro" status.

Do you have an OS preference now that you're about 8 months in?

I would like to get a Macbook pro next time but I feel that it would be underused since I also have a decent desktop. The Air is doing just fine for me.

@CreepinDeth evidently there was something different in the game's manufacturing that changed. Probably later copies included something in the game that initiated the update? Maybe earlier copies had a broken place in the code?

The way I could see that happening is if the wrong product code was used. However, not sure how that could happen with Nintendo checking and approving the games. Also, I don't think the patch would work on the broken copy if that were the case. If it did, then the broken copy would have no problem initiating the download of the patch.

Another reason why digital backups are necessary. Servers that provide patches are not going to be around forever and in these cases leaving games completely unplayable.

So this fairly big youtube channel, JRPG Life, might have discovered the problem with Puzzle & Dragons Mario Edition.

They purchased a few loose copies. Some of them apparently ended up downloading an update. Once that happened, their original copy worked.

Sounds like there might be a patch that's required but not all copies initiate the download? That is pretty weird as well but seems like that's what's happening.

It's a good video. The link below should start at the point where they start loading up P&D. The video is a decent watch as well.

Timestamp is 12:50 if the link doesn't work.

I'm thinking of putting a CDG meet up every week on the calendar. 

We used to do this on our previous format a long ago.

We did?!

I genuinely don't remember. I'd do it but would depend on when.